It’s a Wonderful Life, a Failed Banker Origin Story

Its_A_Wonderful_Life_Movie
The NSA wants to know why I had never watched this before

First, my confession

Before this week, I had never watched Frank Capra’s It’s a Wonderful Life.

I know I should not admit this in a public place.

I know this will land me on the Un-American watch-list with the data-miners at the NSA faster than shouting my support for Al Qaeda in Times Square.

But there it is, the cold truth.  I had never watched It’s a Wonderful Life.

Well, nothing unites the themes of Christmas and suffering bankers as well as this movie, so I sat down to watch it with my eight year-old this week.

Little did I know I would soon be writing a blog post about a) Bank runs and b) The origins of Bankers Anonymous.

***SPOILER ALERT***

For other people who have never seen It’s a Wonderful Life (like me, living under a rock, clearly hating America’s freedoms) I will divulge plot points of this movie that’s played constantly on TV since 1946.  Ok, thank you.

***END SPOILER ALERT***

Ready for snark

I settled in to my couch with a bag full of Harry & David’s chocolate caramel popcorn (aka Yuppie Cracker Jack) in one hand, and a metaphorical pen full of snark on the other.  A syrupy-sweet movie about finance that everybody loves?  I knew I was going to hate it.

The first scene certainly opens up the film to snark.  The starry night, with a couple of disembodied voices, looks worse than an iMovie my eight year-old would make on a bad day.

With those kind of movie production values I’m going to slash through this movie faster than a pint of dulce de leche on a Friday night home alone.

But then I started to relate to the George Bailey (Jimmy Stewart) character

He doesn’t dream of being a banker.  He’s eager to travel, to have adventures, to break away from his hometown.

In fact, he’s really not a good banker at all.  He is what I call “improvident and cheerful,”[1] and runs the Bailey Building and Loan Association nearly into the ground a few times as a result.

Bailey’s also no saint.  When the ultra-capitalist Potter tempts him with a job offer to work for The Man, Bailey nearly goes for it.  Even knowing Potter’s unethical behavior, Bailey wants more money to provide for his family and to gratify his ego.

As a father and husband Bailey takes his blessings for granted.  He complains to his wife about his drafty old house, with a faulty wooden banister ornament.  He resents his young children for making demands on his time, or for practicing the piano loudly as he seeks peace and quiet at home.

When the children in Bailey’s household become especially annoying, I silently looked daggers at my eight year-old on the couch as if to say, “See how you are?”  She just smiled back sweetly and continued making compound interest calculations on her notepad.  (Good girl.)

I sympathized with George Bailey’s woes.  I also started to appreciate the movie’s solid presentation of a few key banking concepts.

Solid banking concepts – fractional reserve lending and bank runs

A) Fractional Reserve Lending

In the first bank run on the Bailey Building and Loan Association – on the eve of George Bailey’s honeymoon – we learn the basics of fractional reserve lending.

Banks never actually hold your money in a vault, as George Bailey explains, but rather they lend it out to others.

One household’s deposits, Bailey explains to his frightened customers, are lent as a mortgage for “Joe’s house, that’s right next yours, and the Kennedy house, and Mrs. Maklin’s house, and a hundred others.”  At any given moment, most deposits do not remain in the bank, or even in liquid securities or cash.  Instead, banks these days hold about 8 to 10% of their total funds in accessible funds, and try to loan the rest out at a profit.

Because all banks, just like the Bailey Building and Loan Association, operate on a fractional reserve lending policy, all banks also run the risk of a bank run.[2]

B) Bank Runs

When Potter calls in a large loan, and probably as a result of a Potter whispering campaign, the people of Bedford Falls lose confidence in Bailey’s bank.  When the depositors of the Bailey Building and Loan Association fear for their accounts, they demand their money in full, an impossibility for a fractional reserve lending bank that isn’t covered by depositor’s insurance.

We get a sense for the panic that sets in when people lose confidence in fractional reserve lending.  Banks that are not too big to fail simply cannot meet the demands of depositors if they all want cash returned at the same time.

Rock Bottom

George Bailey’s faults warmed me up, the accurate banking concepts earned my trust, and then Bailey hit rock bottom and I am completely captured…

On Christmas Eve morning, the unthinkable happens.  Bailey’s uncle misplaces $8,000 just as the bank examiner for the Bailey Building and Loan Association arrives.  The bank, always thin on capital, will go under without the $8,000.  Bailey’s nemesis Potter – who surreptitiously pocketed the money himself – alerts authorities to the missing money, leading to a warrant for Bailey’s arrest.

The stress breaks Bailey, pushing him to reject his family, drink too much, crash his car, and contemplate suicide.

Suddenly I realize that I am George Bailey.

My George Bailey moment(s)

My own ‘bank run’ and business failure played out over a longer period of time than one night, from the Fall of 2008 until the end of 2011.

Up until this point with Bankers Anonymous I haven’t wanted to share the story of my investment business, nor the origins of this blog, because nobody cares for a banker pity-party.  Many people suffered far more than me in the Great Recession, and I cannot compare my own losses to theirs.  But the pop-culture phenomenon of It’s a Wonderful Life – the entire plot hinges on a banker pity-party! – encourages me to at least share my story.

I started my investment company in 2004, and it began to grow in earnest in 2006.  When the jitters of the Summer 2008 turned into the wholesale panic of the Fall of 2008, a majority of my investors requested their money returned.

Two of my institutional investors, both “Fund of Funds” firms[3] requested their entire investment back, each request within a week of each other.  It turns out, both Fund of Funds clients had been wiped out of capital by redemption requests from their own investors.  Simultaneously, a few of my early individual investors also asked for capital returned in the Fall of 2008.

Although I didn’t operate a bank, my nascent fund was hit by a “bank run” just the same.  Too many folks needing their money back all at once meant that other investors demanded their money back, just to avoid being left holding the bag.  Just as depositors do with the Bailey Building and Loan Association.

My remaining investors, many of whom were friends or family, didn’t ask out of the  fund, either out of their belief in me or an unwillingness to abandon a sinking ship.  But by hanging on to these remaining investors I would end up leaving them with illiquid pieces of a dying fund.  By the end of 2008 I realized that to be fair I needed to return money to everyone in the fund at the same time.

The fund manager or banker, subject to a bank run from his investors, rarely seems like a sympathetic character in popular culture.  If I hadn’t lived it myself, I could easily think that the person unable to meet immediate demands for cash was irresponsible with money, or an idiot, or a crook.

Well, I’m none of these things.

And George Bailey’s predicament hit home for me.

Unlike George Bailey, I couldn’t stop the bank run.

Not suicide, but a kind of living death

I never spent a George Bailey Christmas Eve getting drunk, crashing my car, and looking over a bridge contemplating the end.  I’m relatively lucky that I’m not really wired like that.

Instead, I spent three years, from 2008 to 2011, thinking about my own business failure.  First, I made the phone calls to say that you could not have all your money back right away.  Later, I made the phone calls and wrote the letters to say that you should expect losses now, and your money remains at risk of more losses over time.  I liquidated assets as best I could, knowing the range of outcomes was between mildly crappy and terrible, depending on how well I did.  Three years of phone calls and letters to people who had believed in me, keeping them updated on my attempt to turn a smelly dung heap into a useful compost pile.

Three years, walking around, feeling like an fool.

A few examples of my mindset

Just about every waking hour, and many hours asleep, I returned to the ‘bank run’ on my fund, and the subsequent losses for investors, and the loss of my entrepreneurial dream.

Having dinner with my wife.  How do I look my investors in the eye again?

Playing with my growing daughter or holding my newborn.  I can’t believe I had to shut down the fund.  How could I have fucked it up so badly?

Moving to a new city, finding a wonderful home and neighborhood with compatible friends.  Why is a smart guy like me so stupid?  Do they know what a fucking failure I am?  The important thing, of course, is to not let anyone in on my failure.

What do you do for a living?

Whenever any new acquaintances asked me during those three years about what I did for a living, I would mumble something vague about ‘winding down my fund, trying to figure out the next step.’  Something in my tone no doubt implied I didn’t seek any follow-up questions.  My mysteriousness probably gave the mistaken impression that I had plenty of wealth and didn’t really worry about ‘working for a living.’[4]

On the contrary, I obsessed about ‘working for a living.’  How come I failed to provide for my family?  What could I possibly do next?  I was too gun-shy to start another investment company.  Yet I found facile objections to all other professional directions as well.

Occasionally someone close to me would point out how blessed my life seemed.  I would smile and try to nod in agreement, but inside I certainly didn’t feel blessed.  What about my business failure?  Aren’t you forgetting about that?  Because I’m not.

An inscription to make me weep

No_Man_is_a_failure_that_has_friends
Clarence’s inscription to George Bailey

At the end of the movie, George Bailey’s guardian angel Clarence gives a book to Bailey, with the inscription:

Remember no man is a failure who has friends.

George’s wife Mary saves him by appealing to the townspeople of Bedford Falls.  Remind George of your friendship, she urges, and they bail him out financially, as well as spiritually, expressing their love for him on Christmas Eve.

At that point in the movie, cynical me is blinking back tears and snuggling closer to my eight year-old.

After watching me dwell daily, even hourly, on my business failure for three years, my wife took a page from the Mary Bailey strategic playbook.

For my fortieth birthday she asked my closest friends and family to each write a letter expressing appreciation for my friendship.  The result, presented to me in 2012, stunned me. One after another[5] after another[6] after another[7] stunned me with love[8] and thoughtfulness.[9]  You mean, despite my failure, I am worthy of love?

It’s A Wonderful Life captures this kind of moment on film.

These letters’ effect on me

First, of course, waterworks.  Stomach-churning, ear-roaring, and eyesocket-wringing tears.

Second, I had the letters bound into a book.  What’s the one physical possession I would grab and take underground with me when the zombie apocalypse begins?  This book.

Third, I met with a web-designer friend that week about starting a blog called Bankers Anonymous.

Discovering the Bankers Anonymous motto

All-that-you-take-with-you-is-that-which-youve-given-away
New Bankers Anonymous Motto

At the beginning of the first bank run, as he steels himself to save the Bailey Building and Loan Association for the first time, George Bailey glances at a picture of his father.  An inscription next to his father’s photograph reads:

All that you take with you is that which you’ve given away.

Well, I started Bankers Anonymous eighteen months ago to try to give away some financial knowledge I have gained.

Engaging in a dialogue about finance seems the best way I can think of for preventing the next great bank run, the next Big Crash.  If we better understand Wall Street and how it’s regulated, maybe we won’t repeat the same errors.

If we better understand our own personal financial situations, maybe our households won’t be so devastated by the next Great Recession.

Those ideas are what I’ve been trying to give away, and in the process I’ve been able to take with me so much.  Every time a reader comments on my posts or sends an encouraging email, I feel the truth of that inscription at the Bailey Building and Loan Association.

If you celebrate Christmas, and you find yourself begrudging the trip to the mall to acquire an ugly tie for your colleague or the must-have Skanx doll for your pre-teen daughter, all I can suggest is a return to that inscription from It’s a Wonderful Life.

“All that you take with you is that which you’ve given away.”

Peace to All.

 

Its_A_Wonderful_Life_Happy_Ending
Peace to All

 


[1] Bonus points to anyone who recognizes where that phrase “improvident and cheerful” comes from – without referencing The Google, of course.  If you need a hint, I’ve linked to the book here.

[2] All banks except banks covered by deposit insurance such as provided by the FDIC in the United States.  But that coverage did not come into effect until June 1933, presumably after the scene of the initial bank run in It’s a Wonderful Life, which probably takes place in 1932 or early 1933.

[3] A “Fund of Funds” pools together investors such as Endowments or Foundations or individuals and in turn allocates their capital to managers like me.  The problem is, and was, that the Fund of Funds do not control their own capital.  When the original endowment, foundation, or individuals asks for money back, the Fund of Funds requests a redemption from the manager.  See related podcast/post “What the $%& is a Fund of Funds?”

[4] Nope, not wealthy.  The reality is that my wife is a doctor, and we live in a city that’s affordable on one good salary.

[5] “You’ve made it easy when I’ve needed something and returned the favor of needing things from me, which is no small thing.”

[6] “You and your family make me very very happy, and I know you will do so until I die.”

[7] “You are like a brother to me.”

[8] “You have at age 40 what people of my generation traditionally have worked for their whole lives.”

[9] “Give yourself the gift of being able to fail and struggle and shine and succeed, often simultaneously.”

Post read (12997) times.

TED Talk on Inequality – Insights from Rigged Monopoly Games

Definitely worth watching this.

Social scientists rigged a Monopoly game to see how people’s behavior changes with changes in socioeconomic status.  And they tested other games to study the effects of money on things like empathy.  You may not be surprised, but you will be interested.

 

 

Please see related post on Monopoly

and related post on Inequality in America

monopoly

Post read (6763) times.

Book Review – Make Your Kid A Millionaire by Kevin McKinley


Anyone who enjoys engaging in the fantasy “My kid could have a lot more money some day than I do!” should read Make Your Kid A Millionaire – 11 Easy Ways Anyone Can Secure A Child’s Financial Future, by Kevin McKinley.

I know I engage in that fantasy, which is why I took pains, and some pleasure, to teach my eight year old about purchasing her first public shares in a company, and then about compounding returns with her allowance.

McKinley’s book builds on the following, true, premise: kids and parents of young children rarely have much money.  But the advantage they do have actually trumps money: They have time.

Time is the key ingredient to successfully exploiting the magic of compound interest.  Enough time, plus a compounding return, makes anyone a millionaire.

And while we parents of young children generally feel unable to set aside savings on a monthly basis, McKinley rightly points out that we really could do it, if we decided to prioritize a little bit of savings over a little bit of luxury.

Painful, Powerful Prioritization Process

On the issue of eeking out savings to put away for our children, I appreciate his suggested step called the “Painful, Powerful Prioritization Process,” which is to fill out a monthly budget and then for each item in the non-priority column say out-loud to yourself “Spending $143 per month on my cell phone is more important to me than sending my child to college.” Or “having my nails done professionally means more to me than making my child financially independent.” [1]

As someone in complete agreement with McKinley’s premise, naturally I enjoy this book. A few of his specific techniques deserve special mention.

Roth IRA

I’ve written about this before, but the topic deserves repeating.  The inter-generational tax-free wealth machine you can create simply and cheaply with the Roth IRA is almost too good.  As McKinley writes, and I wholeheartedly agree:

I can’t emphasize strongly enough how potent an investment tool the Roth IRA is.  There is virtually no other investment vehicle that is as flexible, available, and convenient, and that offers the potential for growth over the long term without incurring federal taxation!

Creating retirement accounts for minors

McKinley employed his infant daughter as a ‘model’ for marketing and promotional materials for his book, and he includes a picture of her in the introduction.  He paid his daughter $2,000 for her trouble, giving her earned income that year.

Fortunately his infant daughter did not have the ability to blow her $2,000 in earnings on upmarket juice boxes and Ermenegildo Zegna cashmere-silk blend snuggly blankets, so McKinley opened up a $2,000 Roth IRA for his daughter.

As McKinley points out, many parents of small children have the opportunity to employ our children, pay them a “fair” wage, and then shepherd those annual earnings into a retirement account. [2]

Once our kids are teenagers, and have the ability to earn money outside of the house babysitting or doing chores for neighbors, those earning too can be funneled into a retirement account.  Did seventeen year-old Johnny already blow his summer restaurant dishwasher job’s paycheck on frivolous things?  It’s not illegal, if you as a parent have the extra money, to fully fund Johnny’s IRA that year, up to the amount of his earnings.

Because these retirement accounts created for our children may grow unimpeded for 50 years or so, until their retirement, the power of compound interest really helps.

One summer’s $5,000 in dishwashing earnings, growing for 50 years at 7% annual rate, becomes $147,285.  That’s not millionaire status for one summer’s work in a smelly kitchen, but it ain’t nothin’ neither.

401K wisdom

McKinley drives home the point we all need to teach our kids – heck, we all need to teach ourselves – that almost nothing beats 401K participation.  Especially when we’re young and poor.

Stop me if you’ve heard this one before, but the time to fully fund your 401K plan is during your first job, while you’re still in your twenties – when you can least afford it.  I’m sorry, but it’s true.

Worker A, who funds his plan for his first ten working years – say age 22 to 32 will come out ahead of worker B, who skips the first ten years but funds his plan in equal annual amounts for the thirty years following age 32 – assuming an even annual compound return.  It ain’t fair, but it’s simple math.

Estate Planning

I know the least about this area, but I learned quite a bit in the Chapter titled “Protecting your child’s wealth from your child.”  The two goals seem to be a) reduce your tax bill, and b) do not give too much, too soon, to kids.  Since McKinley’s a financial planner, and I’m not, I’ll assume his advice is solid for folks for whom this is an issue.

While I endorse this book, I have a few quibbles as well.

Assumed rate of return

The compound interest formula…

 [which you’ll remember is FV = PV *(1+ Y)^N where:

FV = Future Value (how much money you’ll eventually have)

PV = Present Value (how much money you’ll start with)

Y = Yield, or Rate of Return, or Interest Rate (all equivalent ideas, usually expressed in annual terms)

N = Number of compounding periods (for example, number of years)]

…depends a great deal on what you assume Y, or rate of return, will be.  McKinley wrote Make Your Kid A Millionaire in the sweet, innocent, days of the early 2000s so perhaps may be forgiven for assuming a 10% return whenever he shows the power of compound interest.

Were he to write this book today, I suspect McKinley would assume a more modest 5-7% return on risky equities over the long run.  I know I would, even though this makes millionaire status less achievable.  Unfortunately “Help your kid build a healthy six-figure nest egg!” has less of a ring to it.

Zero coupon bonds

In his chapter on setting aside funds for kids but retaining control over the money, McKinley suggests investing in zero coupon bonds.  This strikes me as both overly complex for most people, as well as a way to earn a terrible return on your long-term money.  Until interest rates change dramatically, and until purchasing zero coupon bonds becomes dramatically easier, I would not endorse this plan.

Variable Annuities

McKinley advocates using these as a kind of retirement plan for kids.  I can’t agree.  The extra layer of fees, opacity, and complexity, in my opinion, overwhelm any advantages that variable annuities have over traditional tax-sheltered retirement plans.  Variable Annuities also violate my basic principal of insurance: use insurance products only for risk-transfer, not for investing.

These few quibbles aside, I still enjoyed this book and learned quite a few things.  Parents of young children, this one’s worth it.

 

Please also see related post: All Bankers Anonymous Book Reviews in one place!

millionaire_kid_book_cover

 

 

 


[1] I am drinking a large 3-shot cappuccino as I write this review.  I can say out loud, with no remorse, that this 3-shot cappuccino really is more important than my kid’s financial security.  But that’s because I’m an addict.  Please forgive me.

 

[2] McKinley notes some legal limits on how children can earn wages.  There are child labor laws of course, and a household ‘allowance’ does not count as ‘earnings’ that may be invested in an IRA.  But there are still many ways young kids can make money, legitimately.

Post read (3589) times.

Excel Basics Introduction Video #6 – Autofill Function

This video, #6 in the series aimed at introducing Excel for small business, shows the autofill function, an extremely useful tool in Excel.  Small business owners may find autofill saves a ton of time when tracking costs and revenues, making future business plans, and preparing for a loan.

 

Excel Basics Video #1 – Introduction to Excel for Small Business

Excel Basics Video #2 – Opening up a Workbook

Excel Basics Video #3 – Arithmetic & Formatting

Excel Basics Video #4 – Sums and Averages

Excel Basics Video #5 – Formatting Cells

Excel_small_business_autofill

Post read (2814) times.

Excel Basics Introduction Video #5 – Formatting

Small business owners need to know how to organize their customers, costs, revenues, loans, financial information, and more in spreadsheet format.  This video, #5 in a  series produced for a regional micro lending organization, continues to introduce key skills to help you get started with Excel.  Formatting cells, columns, and rows saves a ton of time and will serve you well as you grow your business.

 

Excel Basics Video #1 – Introduction to Excel for Small Business

Excel Basics Video #2 – Opening up a Workbook

Excel Basics Video #3 – Arithmetic & Formatting

Excel Basics Video #4 – Sums and Averages

Excel Basics Video #5 – Formatting Cells

Excel Basics Video #6 – Autofill

 

Excel_basics_formatting

Post read (9076) times.

Ask an Ex-Banker: Should I open an IRA?

Planting_Money
This picture comes up when you type ‘ira investing sexy’ into Google Docs. Just FYI.

Dear Banker,

I’m ready to purchase IRAs for my husband and me. We had fun as young 20-somethings and didn’t start saving anything for retirement until our 30s, and even then, sometimes one of us was not always able to set aside money into the 401K/403b offered by employers. So, I figured an IRA would be a good option to help set aside additional funds for retirement. We already have life insurance squared away and are debt-free, apart from our mortgage, and have emergency funds set aside for miscellaneous emergencies (I’m a planner!). I’d rather be taxed now, so I know a Roth IRA would meet that requirement, but what else should I look for? I’m interested in opening the accounts with $2,000 each since I understand we won’t be held to a minimum monthly deposit towards the account that way.  

Thanks for any suggestions you might have!

Jessica in San Antonio, TX

Dear Jessica,

I’ll answer some of your questions quickly, and then go back and fill in the details to the same questions below.

Should you do it?

Yes

When should you do it?

Yesterday

Roth IRA vs. Traditional IRA?

Doesn’t matter

How much should I invest?

$2,000 each for you and your spouse is great.

For 2013 and 2014 the maximum amount per person is $5,500

What to invest in?

A low-cost, diversified, equities-only, mutual fund.

With whom should I open the account?

Well, since none of the fund companies are paying me through advertising, I’m reluctant to name…Ok, fine:  Vanguard.

Since you may want more details with each of these topics, I flesh out my answers below.

IRA_Not_Dead_Not_Poor
Sorta funny, sorta true

Should you do it?

Yes.

If you have any surplus money available for savings and investment – in your case, $4,000 this year – open your IRAs before doing almost any other savings or investment activity.

Because IRAs offer-tax advantaged investing, it’s virtually impossible to beat the returns in an IRA account when compared to any other investment account.

Why do I say that?  There are several reasons, all having to do with ‘after-tax’ calculations.

Tax advantages in the year you contribute to an IRA

If your income tax rate is, for example, 25%, then you need to earn $2,500 in order to have the equivalent of $2,000 available to invest in an account.

For non-IRA investing, right off the bat, $500 goes to the IRS, and $2,000 goes in your bank.

When you invest in a traditional IRA, however, the full contribution amount can be deducted from your taxable income.  The result – at a 25% tax rate – is that you have 25% more money to invest.

Another way of saying this is that you got a 25% ‘return’ on your after-tax investment just by putting money into a traditional IRA when compared to investing through a non-IRA account.

Does this matter in the long run? Yes!

Here are some calculations, using the magical powers of compound interest math, to illustrate the long-term difference in outcomes between IRA investing and non-IRA[1] investing.

  • Invest $2,500 in 2013 in an IRA for 30 years and earn 5% per year.  Result: $10,805.
  • Invest $2,000 in 2013 in a non-IRA for 30 years and earn 5% per year. Result $8,644.
Tax_advantaged_investing_grows_over_time
$500 tax advantage grows to $2,000 in 30 years at 5% return

That’s more than a $2,000 differential in the end, an amount higher than your initial contribution amount.  The greater the return assumption over the 30 years, the higher the final difference between IRA and non-IRA accounts.

If you invest this way, every year for 30 years, always choosing the $2,500 tax-advantaged IRA contribution rather than the $2,000 after-tax contribution, earning 5% per year on each contribution, you will have $174,402 rather than $139,522, a difference of $34,880.

Tax advantages of transactions inside your account

The tax advantages of IRAs do not stop there.

Or as the late-night television Ginsu Knife Advertisement would say: But Wait! There’s Much, Much, More!

Any time you sell a stock or mutual fund position in a traditional (non-IRA) investment account you must pay taxes that year on any appreciation (or gains) in the investment.  If you held the stock for less than a year you will owe your regular income tax rate of 25% on the money you made.

Ginsu_Knife_Now_How_much_would_you_pay
IRAs, like Ginsu knives: But Wait! There’s More!

Even if you held the stock for more than a year you would owe long-term capital gains, probably 15% in your case.  If you receive dividends or bond payments within your investment account, those will also be taxed at high rates such as 25%.  Giving back 15-25% of your investment gains when the stock went up is incredibly destructive to your future wealth-building plan.

 

For this reason, actively buying and selling stocks in a traditional investment account makes about as much financial sense as stabbing your money with a Ginsu Knife.[2]

If you sell a stock or mutual fund within your IRA, by contrast, you owe no taxes on the gains.  This, as the financially-savvy Seattle-based poet Macklemore would say, is f-ing awesome.

If you plan to sell any investments in your account over the next 30 years, you will do yourself a huge favor if those investments remain shielded from taxation within an IRA.

Macklemore_thrift_shop
This poet knows thrift like Bo knows baseball

Tax advantages of retirement income from the Roth IRA

I see from your question, Jessica, that you’re oriented toward a Roth IRA rather than a traditional IRA.  If you open up a Roth instead of a traditional IRA – and I don’t blame you if you do – you do not reap the income tax benefits in the year you invested.  You would instead enjoy tax-free income in your retirement years when you take the money out, which is also quite awesome.

roth_ira_money
Roth IRA or Traditional IRA? Both are great!

The most important financial comparison is not between a traditional IRA and a Roth IRA, but rather between a non-IRA and an IRA account

In your retirement years, when you sell your investments for income, a Roth IRA is more valuable than a non-IRA account because of the difference in after-tax income.

If you have a 25% income tax bracket in your retirement years, for example, your $10,000 in Roth IRA income is the equivalent of $12,500 in non-IRA income.

Ok, time to move on to the next answer to your questions.

When should you do it?

Yesterday.

I answer “yesterday” in a nod to the old investing saw “When is the best time to invest?” for which the correct answer is always “thirty years ago.”

The most important factor for racking up impressive investment returns is the passage of time.  Due, as always, to the magic of compound interest.

The good news, however, is that if you open your IRA now, in your 40s, you actually can take advantage of the next thirty years.  By the time you and your husband retire and need to live off your investments, you will have invested “thirty years ago.”  You will enjoy Madame President Cyrus’ administration in 2043 that much more if you feel wealthy.

Madame_President_Cyrus_in_2043
Madame President Cyrus in 2043, when your IRA has grown for thirty years

So go for it.  Today.

Roth IRA vs. Traditional IRA

Doesn’t matter.

Much digital ink has been spilled parsing the advantages of one vs. the other.  But do we really have to argue?

Beatles vs. Rolling Stones.[3]

Brady vs. Manning.[4]

Kristen Bell vs. Jennifer Lawrence.[5]

These are all awesome choices.

Kristen_Bell_Jennifer_Lawrence
Kristen Bell or Jennifer Lawrence? Do not make me choose

Both the Traditional IRA and Roth IRA beat any non-IRA option available.

Confidently choosing one over the other would require you to compare today’s income tax rates to future income tax rates in your retirement, something you can guess at, but with no certainty.

Roth IRAs boast a clever feature that allows you to pass on wealth to young heirs which I wrote about before, but income eligibility limits make taking advantage of the Roth IRA harder than a traditional IRA.[6]

How much should I invest?

Your planned $2,000 each for you and your husband is great to start.  The more the merrier.

Again, a $5,500 upper limit for you if you’re under age 50.  A $6,500 upper limit if you’re aged 50 or older.

The income limits for IRA contributions are maddeningly complex for such a simple investment vehicle, a point which I tried to make last year (probably unsuccessfully) through this purposefully confusing infographic.  For your purposes, however, the $2,000 is a great place to start, and I agree you’ll avoid charges from most investment companies with a $2,000 minimum.

A quick aside on the subject of minimum investments: 

I taught a personal finance course to college students last Spring, and one of my mandatory assignments for these 18-22 year olds was to open their own IRA.  I figured that even if they only had $100, and even if that $100 went into the wrong product, the practical and pedagogical benefit of opening the account and researching the account would more than make up for the inefficiency, cost, and their lack of any actual income that required tax-deferral.  My theory was perfectly sound.  Just ask me.

In practice, the assignment really pissed them off.  They didn’t have $100 extra (so they claimed), and they quickly discovered very limited options for their minimal investment amounts (a bank CD for example), and fees on top of that, if their balance remained below something like $1,000 or $2,000.  I endured a few weeks of complaints and hissing with steely resolve until my co-teacher intervened and made the assignment optional.  Probably saved my tires from being slashed.

The lesson: I’m a real pain in the ass as a teacher.

Also, IRAs don’t make sense for less than an initial $1,000 to $2,000.

 

What to invest in?

Jessica, I want to make your life easy.  Trust me on this next one.

An entire Trillion dollar industry – known around these parts as the Financial Infotainment Industrial Complex – would like you to pay extraordinary, mostly obscured, fees for a very ordinary financial service.

The industry would also like you to believe that an entire universe of options must be sifted through, parsed professionally, opined upon, and cleverly navigated.  You don’t have time for that.  You don’t need that.

What you want with your 30-year time horizon until retirement is the chance to receive the returns of broad equity markets.  Not beat the market, just get the market returns.

So, your goal is:

1. Pay minimal fees

2. Earn the market return

3. With a 30-year horizon, you need 100% equities.  You cannot afford the low returns of anything less risky.[7]

The words you need to know are: “a low-cost (probably indexed) mutual fund covering a broad sector of either US or global equities”[8]

Keep asking for that, and only that, until you get it.

Choose_Index_fund_every_time
One illustration of index versus managed funds

With whom should I open the account?

Vanguard doesn’t pay me to say this (which sucks for me)[9] but they pioneered this type of investing decades ago, and so they deserve credit for doing the right thing, early on.  My own retirement account is with them.

At this point, dozens of other mutual fund companies offer a similarly awesome “low-cost (probably indexed) mutual fund covering a broad sector of either US or global equities.”

If you or a friend or family member already has an account or a relationship with any of these other fine companies, by all means open up an account with that other company.  I believe in signing up for the fewest number of service providers.

But do not let them talk you into anything more complex (read: expensive and unnecessary) than what I described in quotes above.

Jessica, I hope that helps, and congrats on getting going with your IRAs.

 

Please see related posts on the IRA:

The Humble IRA

IRAs don’t matter to high income people

A rebuttal: The curious case of Mitt Romney

The magical Roth IRA and inter-generational wealth transfer

The 2012 IRA Contribution Infographic

The DIY Movement and the IRA

Angel Investing and the IRA

 

 



[1] By “Non-IRA” I just mean any old investment account that you might buy stocks in.  A regular taxable account.  Something not tax-advantaged like an IRA or 401K plan.

[2] After which, of course, the knife will remain sharp and cut easily through a ripe tomato.

[3] Beatles.

[4] Brady.  Duh.

[5] Don’t make me choose, I don’t want to break either of their gentle hearts.

[6] Incidentally – and not relevant to your original question – if I had plenty of disposable wealth and income and a large traditional IRA, I’d probably convert it to a Roth IRA.

[7] As best explained in this book Simple Wealth, Inevitable Wealth by Nick Murray,

[8] Global is better than US, for a variety of theoretical reasons simply explained in this book I recently reviewed, but investing in a broadly diversified US equity index is also not ‘wrong’ for your purposes.

[9] Hey Vanguard? Throw me a freakin’ bone here!

Post read (8445) times.