Last week I did a Texas Public Radio live storytelling event with the theme “Big Break and Busts,” so naturally I told the story of my failed investment fund. I’ve covered a bit of this before, as the Bankers Anonymous Origin Story.
Here’s the audio for that event.
Or the embedded Soundcloud format:
I’m going to go ahead and cry in this corner over here. Don’t mind me!
Post read (170) times.
Editor’s note: A version of this post appeared in the San Antonio Express-News under my “So…Money” column, “Dan Loeb Is Not ‘San Antonio Nice’.”
It’s probably hard for non-San Antonians to understand the importance of this one medium-sized company for the city’s image of itself. Rackspace is the darling of San Antonio’s business community, a single company carrying on its shoulders the hopes of 21st Century economic development to this sleep South Texas city. Rackspace’s faltering stock price, competitive pressure from internet giants Google, Amazon and Microsoft, and management changes at the top all make city boosters understandably nervous.
Most San Antonians do not know hedge funder Dan Loeb, so I thought I’d review some highlights of his style to an audience unfamiliar with him.
Third Point’s Dan Loeb has earned a place in the pantheon of the Top-10 most-talked-about hedge fund managers in the world, in part through his investing acumen, and in larger part through his acerbic letters to management of companies where Third Point LLC has taken a significant stake, and where he sees underperformance.
Loeb is a finance writer’s dream, because he provides the kind of quotable “He said!” and then “Can you believe he said back?” chisme that fueled all of our 7th grade social lives.
I am reasonably certain that nothing that Dan Loeb does with respect to Rackspace will have any effect on the lives of people in San Antonio, except for maybe one or two top management Rackers who he seeks to personally humiliate. This will not be pleasant for them.
When Loeb does write about them, however, we will all have a front row seat to the boxing ring in which a smart and brutal man swings to land heavy punches on smart, less brutal, men.
In most cases in my writing I strive to remain above the “He said, she said” fray about finance, because of its profound irrelevance to real people’s actual lives.
But I confess that a small, evil, part of me is curious about the upcoming spectacle. I think this makes me not quite “San Antonio nice” yet.
If you have not sampled Dan Loeb’s so-called poison pen yet, let me introduce you to a few of his classics.
In 2006, to the insufficiently responsive board of directors of Nabi Biopharmaceuticals, Loeb wrote: “you hide your heads in the nearest warm aperture in an apparent “ostrich defense” and ignore your shareholders…in the hope that the Company’s owners will go away before your next annual meeting.”
To the CEO of a Spokane, WA-based lumber company named Potlatch corporation Loeb famously wrote in 2003 “Since you ascended to your current role of Chief Value Destroyer (“C.V.D.”) when you assumed the formal title of C.E.O in 1999, the shares have dropped over 45%, a destruction of shareholder value in excess of $520 million.” About underfunding the firm’s pension plan, Loeb lashed out to the CEO “Your sorry excuse that ‘everyone else does it’ is reminiscent of a teenager who uses peer pressure as a pretext to explain his drug problem. I only wish that I could recommend a recovery program for you and [then C.F.O.] Gerald Zuelhke for your apparent addiction that could be called “Value Destroyers Anonymous.”
To the directors of high-end auction house Sotheby’s, in 2013, Loeb penned “We acknowledge that Sotheby’s is a luxury brand, but there appears to be some confusion – This does not entitle senior management to live a life of luxury at the expense of shareholders.”
In that same letter Loeb further criticized Sotheby’s core art strategy, writing “It is apparent to us from our meeting that you do not fully grasp the central importance of contemporary and modern art to the company’s growth strategy, which is highly problematic since these are the categories expanding most rapidly among new collectors.” Sotheby’s, by the way, changed strategy and invited Loeb’s preferred three new board members.
On the subject of the underperforming shares of tech companies, Loeb can be particularly brutal, as when he relentlessly attacked Yahoo’s CEO Scott Thompson as well a board member Patti Hart for inaccuracies on their professional resumes. Thompson left shortly thereafter and was succeeded in the CEO position by Marissa Mayer.
Cultural clashes with high-profile brash commentators have a history of setting San Antonians teeth on edge. I’m thinking of Charles Barkley’s recent comments during the playoffs about women from the city. If Loeb does launch one of his poison pen attacks, I assume Rackspace will find the city rallying to its defense.
Because Dan Loeb is not San Antonio nice.
Post read (1488) times.
I’m quick to criticize traditional media when they dumb down, or sex up, or just miss completely on finance topics.
The Wall Street Journal is better than most, but still I find myself shaking my fist at the paper from time to time.
Earlier this week, in anticipation of the relaxation of rules for Hedge Fund advertising – and most importantly, the WSJ’s pole position to attract that advertising – they ran an explanatory article on ‘What is a Hedge Fund?’
Actually, it’s quite good, and accompanied by an audio clip as well. Since the article is behind a pay wall for many, I’ve quoted it here:
Ask 10 investors to define “hedge fund” and you’re likely to get 10 different answers.
The catchall term is used to describe an industry with an estimated $2.4 trillion in assets and an array of portfolios that feature dramatically different investment strategies, tolerance for risk and goals for returns.
“It’s a misguided term that tells you nothing” about the manager’s investment approach, says Jason Gerlach, president of the California Hedge Fund Association and managing director at hedge-fund firm Sunrise Capital Partners LLC in San Diego.
Instead, the term generally refers to the structure of the investment: “It generally means a private investment partnership” instead of, say, a mutual fund, Mr. Gerlach says.
Though long viewed by many as secretive instruments offered only to the extremely wealthy via privileged connections or exclusive websites, hedge funds are about to come out of the closet: An 80-year-old ban on hedge-fund advertising is falling away, and some of these private investment pools are gearing up to launch ad campaigns—likely as early as this month.
Mysterious for a Reason?
Some believe the advertisements will help demystify the strategies used by hedge-fund managers. “Hedge funds are often raked over the coals because they’re mysterious, but they’re mysterious because regulators don’t let them talk,” says Mitch Ackles, president of the Hedge Fund Association and chief executive of Hedge Fund PR LLC, a strategy and marketing company.
Hedge-fund manager John Paulson reaped huge gains betting against subprime mortgages in 2007 and 2008.
The term “hedge fund” was reportedly first used by Alfred Winslow Jones, a sociologist and financial journalist who created an investment partnership in 1952. Mr. Jones used leverage—that is, borrowing—to increase his investment exposure, and sold short what he believed to be overvalued securities in an attempt to “hedge” the market and profit regardless of whether it rose or fell.
Today, hedge funds still generally employ a hedging technique—counterbalancing one investment against another—but even that is not always the case, says Josh Charney, a fund analyst at investment-research firm Morningstar Inc. “That was the first purpose of a hedge fund, to hedge and offer some safety, but over time it has strayed from that original definition,” he says.
But hedge funds still typically have more-flexible investment strategies than mutual funds. They may have higher leverage, for instance, or invest heavily in illiquid holdings such as art, antiques or thinly traded securities.
For these more aggressive tactics, the funds typically charge steeper fees than do mutual funds, generally an asset-management fee of 1% to 2% and a performance fee of 20% of the fund’s profit annually.
In an effort to protect investors with limited means, hedge funds are closed by federal securities law to all but “accredited” investors—which includes individuals with an annual income that exceeds $200,000 for the past two years or a net worth exceeding $1 million excluding their primary residence. In addition, the funds generally require minimum investments of at least $250,000 and limit how frequently investors may withdraw cash.
Hedge Fund Research Inc.’s HFRI Fund Weighted Composite Index, a broad proxy for the hedge-fund universe, gained 3.8% this year through August (net of fees), while the S&P 500 index gained 16.2% with dividends and the Barclays Government/Credit Bond Index shed 3.2% over the same period, according to HFR. For the five years through August, the HFRI Fund Weighted Composite Index gained an annualized 3.4% while the S&P 500 index gained 7.3% with dividends.
Range of Volatility
Investors generally look to the funds to reduce volatility. But prospective investors should understand that just as some hedge-fund strategies may enhance returns, they may also amplify losses, and some strategies are more volatile than others.
“Investors have to judge each fund individually because fund managers may be doing vastly different things,” says Mr. Ackles.
“Relative value” arbitrage strategies account for about 27% of industry assets, according to HFR. Managers of relative-value funds will simultaneously buy markets or investments expected to appreciate, while selling related securities expected to depreciate, seeking to profit from their relative value. That allows the funds to generate returns with little correlation to markets. Such strategies can be executed with convertible bonds, preferred securities, options, warrants and other instruments.
As Hurricane Katrina bore down on the U.S. in the summer of 2005, for example, some hedge-fund managers owned short-term contracts on oil and gas, a bet that prices would rise soon. But they also took bearish positions on longer-dated contracts, a bet that the prices would fall in coming months.
Relative-value arbitrage funds may employ lots of leverage, which can result in big gains or losses. Long-Term Capital Portfolio LP, which famously collapsed in 1998, was a relative-value fund.
This year through July, the HFRI Relative Value (Total) Index has gained about 3.6%, according to HFR.
Then there are event-driven hedge funds, which invest in securities that may be affected by corporate activity such as bankruptcies, mergers, reorganizations and hostile takeovers. Managers of these funds seek to predict the relative movement of the securities involved. A manager may invest, for example, in the stock of a company that is being acquired while also selling short the stock of the acquiring company. Event-driven strategies that focus on companies in financial trouble are often referred to as distressed investing.
Event-driven funds fared well in the first half, partly due to a dynamic merger-and-acquisition and corporate-actions environment, according to HFR. The HFRI Event-Driven (Total) Index gained 6.9% this year through July. Funds using these strategies account for about 26% of industry assets, according to HFR.
Next in size, with about 21% of industry assets, HFR says, are so-called macro strategy hedge funds, which, as their name suggests, invest with a broad outlook that tries to anticipate changes in economic trends and policy decisions.
Some of the funds that use a macro strategy invest in stocks, bonds, currencies and commodities, and may shift their exposure to asset classes and countries rapidly. Such funds often employ leverage and derivatives to enhance the impact of market moves, and their returns may be very volatile as a result.
Global macro investing is one of the best-known hedge-fund strategies, partly because it has been employed by well-known managers such as George Soros and Julian Robertson.
Many macro hedge funds were popular in the 1990s and posted big gains during the 2008 financial crisis. This year through July, the HFRI Macro (Total) Index has slipped 0.95%, according to HFR.
Ms. Maxey is a special writer for The Wall Street Journal in New York. Email her at daisy.maxey@wsj.com.
Post read (8302) times.
We’ll let you know when we have new posts!