Thy Will Be Done – And Do it NOW

Editor’s Note: This post ran as as newspaper column in the beginning of March 2020, before it was clear the imminent threat that COVID-19 posed to everyone’s health. So…this message just got a lot more urgent since the beginning of March.

In December 2017, my friend, who I will call LM, and her sisters visited their elderly father for Christmas. During that visit, he verbally expressed a few wishes to her, just in case something should happen to him.

At the time, he had gone so far as to have a will drawn up, but he had not finalized a plan with his official signature. In addition, he had not authorized anyone with a durable power of attorney, in case of illness.

LM is not sure if he didn’t finalize papers with his signature due to a psychological block around facing his mortality, a mistaken idea for saving money, or hesitation around who should use his apartment if he died. All she knows is that he’d done 99% of the process, but didn’t complete it.

A week later, in January 2018, he fell ill and was hospitalized. Then, family hell broke loose. The story is a bit complicated, as these stories always are. As Tolstoy wrote in the beginning of Anna Karenina, “every unhappy family is unhappy in its own way.” Like other 19th Century novels, LM’s story stems from contested estates, suspicion between family members, and expensive legal processes.

LM’s father’s girlfriend became verbally abusive. LM’s aunts – LM’s father’s sisters – were suing LM’s father, in the mistaken belief that LM’s father – as trustee of their father’s trust – was collecting more than his fair share, while their father LM’s grandfather was still alive.

Meanwhile, paying for her father’s care during a 2-months’ long hospitalization became complicated. Without a written and signed power of attorney, and in the face of a draining lawsuit and logistical difficulty even making health care decisions, LM and her family had to declare a “conservatorship” for her father’s assets. Her father died at the end of February 2018 without a will, and with his estate under legal attack from his own sisters. 

Tanya Feinleib, an attorney and shareholder at Langley & Banack in San Antonio, board certified in estate planning and probate law, says this type of “conservatorship” or “guardianship” can be an expensive and cumbersome court-supervised process.

Langley_Banack

LM describes three kinds of costs to not having a will and power and attorney at the time of her father’s death. The first is in time. 

LM’s father died in late February 2018, two full years ago. She and her two sisters have only just this past month settled the probate case, and settled a lawsuit with her aunts. Two years is a long time to remain suspended in an uncomfortable legal process with family members, made worse by the mixture of mourning, family strife, and uncertainty.

The second cost is the most obvious one, dollars drained from her father’s estate. LM calculated that her father’s estate paid 13 times more than necessary, for lack of a power of attorney. She calculates that her father’s estate paid 3 times more than necessary for lack of a will. When she includes the costs of settling the lawsuit with her aunts, more than 30% of her father’s estate was lost due to a combination of unclear communication and unfinished estate planning. Over half a million dollars remained suspended in probate, and then drained by a third, over two years. 

But the third cost, LM says, was the worst.

LM told me, “What’s even more tragic are the physical, psychological and spiritual costs of siblings who used to love each other growing to hate each other. All of that stress physically manifests in them. The worst cost imaginable to me, would be to be so insanely angry with a sibling that you couldn’t find it in you to forgive them, to say good-bye to them on their deathbed or even attend their funeral. That still makes me cry when I think about it.”

A 2016 Gallup poll found that just 44 percent of American adults have a will Of course this number varies by age, with only 14 percent of those aged 18-29 having a will (Millennials, amirite?), and 68 percent of folks over age 65 with a will. (Ok, Boomer) I’m now talking to the 32 percent of you without a will. What are you thinking? Do it. Do it now.

Last_will

You should expect the cost – for a family without complicated trusts or an ultra-high net worth – to range between $1,000 and $2,500 to prepare a will and power of attorney documents. Expect on the low end for single people without dependents. Higher for more complex families and estate requirements. Feinleib says that there are legal aid providers in many cities, including Houston and San Antonio, that offer free wills and powers of attorney for people who qualify. Some employers offer an employee assistance program for free or subsidized time with an attorney, which could be used to get your will done.

It may be tempting to try to save money without an attorney. Feinleib says web-based or artificial intelligence will-preparation could happen in our lifetime, but don’t rely on that yet. 

“For now, with respect to handwritten wills and off-the-internet wills” Feinleib warns, “When they go wrong, they tend to be extremely expensive on the probate side.”

My friend LM’s main reason for speaking with me about the details was to encourage other people to get this done right away. To not let her family’s heartache happen to other families.

Feinleib says “I think it’s the most loving thing you can do for your family. Your incapacity is going to be one of the worst moments of their life.” By properly preparing for that time, she says, you give your family a great gift.

The costs and some of the heartaches endured by LM and her family were avoidable. Says Feinleib, “every person needs to have a plan in place for who will make decisions regarding health care if they become incapacitated.”

Would you like to know the worst, ironic part of this? Even two years following her father’s death, even after years of expensive litigation, LM’s own mother has still not prepared her own will. LM herself is a certified financial planner, and one of her sisters is an attorney. And they still can’t convince their own mother to prepare her will. After the last two years of probate hell and family struggle, LM was in a state of near-disbelief when she told me this, caught somewhere between shock and bursting into tears.

A version of this post ran in the San Antonio Express-News and Houston Chronicle.

Post read (125) times.

DAF and Dying With A Surplus

dafIf you face the high-quality problem of finishing your life with too much money, you’ve probably already figured out that three groups, and three groups only, get your surplus: The government, your family, and your preferred charities. Of these, we typically all agree about leaving the lowest legal amount to the government. Then we face tremendous stress about how to allocate our fortune between the other two.

This post not only nudges you toward door number three (your favorite charities!) but advocates a tax-efficient, low-cost way to do it, available to people of even modest means.

But first, the problem of children.

Many choose to prioritize their children or relatives first, which is fine, whatever, it’s your dollar. My own personal starting point about inheritance discussions is this: children do not deserve free money.

This partly explains why I like estate taxes more than other forms of taxation.

However, I realize we’re not going to all agree on that one, and I’m not (yet) in a position to vastly increase federal estate taxes.

Meanwhile, what do people facing a wealth surplus worry about? Merrill Lynch – in a 2015 report titled “How Much Should I Give To My Family? On the Risks and Rewards of Giving ” – found two problems when they surveyed their high net-worth clients. First, 42 percent of respondents plan to pass on their assets only AFTER their death, rather than while they’re alive. Second, more than 60 percent of high net-worth clients worried about the potential negative effects of inherited wealth on their children.

The problem, as Merrill Lynch and other financial advisors will likely agree, is that those findings bump up against two well-known estate-planning principles.

First, giving away money during your lifetime – rather than after your death – is the most efficient way to minimize taxes on transferring your wealth. And 42 percent of Merrill Lynch respondents weren’t planning that. So now all we need is a (tax-efficient, low-cost) way to give money away while you’re still alive. Keep reading.

childrenSecond, the key to lowering stress in estate planning is to put your personal values in the center of the plan. More than 60 percent are stressed about the tension between their values and their children’s values, which means they have not sufficiently figured out answers to the questions: What do you believe in? What do you stand for? What people or organizations or values represent the highest expressions of meaning in your life?

If it’s all about your children, cool, give them the money. If you have other values you want to express as well, however, let’s talk about donor-advised funds for a moment.

Donor Advised Funds

What’s the best way to give away money during your lifetime? Although that’s too broad a question, I’m going to opine anyway. A very good way – surprisingly both affordable and flexible – seems to be donor-advised funds (DAF).

You should obviously be cautious when taking tax, legal, and financial advice from someone who writes a blog, but it seems to me a DAF offers tremendous advantages in a simpler – and therefore lower cost – way than a foundation or trust, especially if your estate will not require the Full Monty of intergenerational wealth planning.

donor_advisedMost of the major brokerage houses and investment firms offer donor-advised funds, which appear to a nice, low-cost way to accomplish an expression of your values in your lifetime – and beyond! – without setting up a potentially complicated and expensive legal structure, such as a foundation or trust.

Here are some basics when you contribute to a DAF:

  1. You can enjoy a charitable gift tax benefit in the year of your gift.
  2. Your assets continue to grow in value, tax free, over time.
  3. You don’t have to designate all of your charitable beneficiaries now, because your appointed trustees – such as you and your children – can designate gifts to charities over time.
  4. Giving involves a simple call or note to the brokerage firm, which then confirms the recipient charity is legit. After verifying that, the money for your donation goes out to the charity in just a few days’ time.

Mostly what the DAF gives you, as I view it, is time to enjoy giving while you are still alive. That’s time to make future decisions and hold conversations with your children or other designated trustees about your values. I also like the idea that you get a chance, during your lifetime, to observe and reflect on the effect of your gift. Is the charity actually fulfilling its mission? Is it fulfilling your mission? And then, why not actually get thanked in person, rather than the grimmer path of grateful recipients having to thank a plaque with your name on it?

charityI looked up three different well-known, name-brand brokerage companies to check out fees and account minimums on their DAFs.

All three charged 0.6% annual fees on DAFs, with reduced fees on accounts over $500,000.

The National Philanthropic Trust reports the average DAF reached $296,701 in 2014. but clearly you can open up one of these funds for far less. Two of the three brokerage firms I looked at offer opening account minimums of $5,000, while a third required a $25,000 minimum.

What that says to me is that tax-advantaged, value-driven charitable giving of your wealth – both in your lifetime and beyond – isn’t something only available to the extremely wealthy. Instead, pretty sophisticated philanthropic vehicles are available to Main Street investors, who just happen to have a little surplus.

You can give your assets to the DAF this year, enjoying all available tax advantages of that gift now, and spend future years giving to worthy causes.

You can do this over time in consultation with your children or designated trustees, affording you the satisfaction of giving, as well as the pleasure of talking about and expressing your highest values.

That seems like a really nice legacy to pass on.

 

A version of this appeared in the San Antonio Express News and the Houston Chronicle.

Please see related posts:

The Estate Tax

Estate Tax Takedown – Levine v. Mankiw

Philanthropy Part I – Giving Money Away

Philanthropy Part II – Asking for Money

 

Post read (747) times.

Death and Taxes and Fairness

death_and_taxesA version of this post appeared in the San Antonio Express News.

I recently wrote about the unfairness of ‘carried interest’ tax breaks targeted to hedge fund and private equity owners. In fact, I’ve covered the topic before as well.

Some readers became angry about my view of this tax break and took umbrage at my lack of sympathy for ‘job creators’ like hedge fund owners.

Among other complaints, readers wondered why I didn’t write about tax atrocities like the ‘death tax,’ known in other circles as the estate tax.

Inspired by that critique, I will offer my thoughts on other taxes that I pay and tax breaks that I enjoy, both from an objective standpoint – taking into account ‘what’s fair for society’ – and from a subjective standpoint – taking into account my own personal situation and ‘what’s fair to me.’

For this post: The Estate Tax.

Fair to Society
Honestly, estate taxes are my favorite ‘fair to society’ tax. When I am declared ‘Lord Of All Catan’ over this entire country I will quickly and happily raise the estate tax rate and lower the exemption for estate taxation. Estate taxes are fair to society because:

Very few pay this tax, which makes it 'fair' in my view
Very few pay this tax, which makes it ‘fair’ in my view

1. They are ‘progressive’ in the sense that they tax the upper levels of wealth and leave less wealthy households unaffected. Half of the estate taxes in this country are paid by the top 0.1% of income earners, and virtually all estate taxes are paid by the top 10% of earners.

2. All taxes distort the efficiency of markets, but estate taxes distort consumption and other economic activity less than other taxes. That minimized distortion makes it more efficient than other taxes.

3. Estate taxes contribute in some (small) way toward ‘churning’ the stratified wealth levels of society, something that is fair in a society that values socio-economic mobility.

4. Estate taxes encourage the creation of philanthropic avenues such as endowments and foundations to avoid estate taxation. In that way the wealthy dedicate funds according to their specific moral choices (education, health, fitness, parks, art, scientific research, whatever) rather than trusting to the government to make those choices for them. A diverse range of non-governmental philanthropic funding streams strengthens civil society.
Absence of Data
While I don’t have the economic statistics to back up statements two through four above – I instinctively feel they apply to any tax on inheritance. Maybe you totally disagree. I’m ok with that. Maybe you’d like to agree, but you’d also like to see some data to back up my statements.

For readers who prefer actual data over pontificating, I offer in reply one of my favorite sayings from former San Antonio Express News writer and faux-philosopher Jack Handey:

“Instead of having ‘answers’ on a math test, they should just call them ‘impressions,’ and if you got a different ‘impression,’ so what, can’t we all be brothers?”

Fair to Me
Since I don’t expect to inherit much from my parents, and I don’t expect to pass on much to my own children, I find the estate tax extremely ‘fair to me.’

I say, bring it on!

So that was easy. But now let me try a thought experiment.
How would my mind alter under different circumstances?

A mental test
What if I had a ten million dollar estate coming my way, and the federal estate tax would take 40% of all the money I was set to inherit over my $5 million estate tax exemption? Would I find it so ‘fair to me’ then? 1

I would like to think that I would be wise and grateful enough not to begrudge the federal government the $2 million estate tax (40% of the $5 million over the $5 million exemption amount) because I would get to keep $8 million in inheritance.

Ah, a cool $8 million for me, that I didn’t have to work for.

“I’m just lucky to be born into a family with $10 million to pass on,” I would think to myself as I inhaled from my Rosemary-Lime scented calming soap I order in bulk from Gwyneth Paltrow’s website.

Frankly, that’s not a bad deal that would leave me impoverished. I’m pretty sure I could just squeak by on a mere $8 million. In that scenario I do think the estate tax would still be ‘fair to me.’

The real test
Ok, but what if I stood to inherit a $100 million estate from my parents? And the federal government could tax 40% of my $95 million, (remember: we all get to keep the first inherited $5 million tax-free!) leaving me with just $62 million?

How do I like that estate tax now?

Well, if you put it that way, now I’m angry.

Because that is totally not fair to me!

Most importantly, how is guy like me supposed to get by on just $62 million? I have rights you know, based on the family I was born into.

The federal government probably just squandered the $38 million death tax it extracted from my deceased hard-working parents and me and gave it away to welfare queens and immigrants!

Gah!

Did you guys just call me a 'piker'
Did you guys just call me a ‘piker’

Somebody get the Koch brothers on the line right now and let’s fix this unfair system together!

What?

The Koch brothers said they don’t want to talk to me ‘and my measly $62 million?’

They said I’m a ‘piker?’

Oh, the humanity!

 
Please see previous posts on taxation such as:

Carried interest tax break seems unfair to me

Shhh…Please don’t talk about my tax loophole

Adult conversation about tax policy

529 Accounts and Tax Fairness

And see this interesting New York Times piece on the estate tax, linking it to wars of the Twentieth Century and ideas of fairness in society.

 

 

Post read (1963) times.

  1. Technically, I would be taxed on 40% of all amounts over $5.34 million – the current exemption for estate taxes – but please humor me, I’m trying to stick to round numbers to keep the numbers from distracting us.

Guest Post: Getting Real on Estate Planning

pic-estate-planning

[Editor’s Note: Reader ToddR noticed, correctly, that I know very little about estate planning, despite my having written a post about it last week.  He offered up his real-life experience with the topic.  I’m pleased to have a great guest post on the issue of estate planning.  I am also doubly pleased since I’m on vacation this week!  – The Banker]

The Banker dangled the idea of elaborating on estate planning.  Thrillingly, I’m jumping at the chance to briefly upstage a Harvard man.  [1]

As was previously noted, this isn’t legal advice so, reader beware.  The Average Joe thinks that estate planning consists of calling a guy that your cousin recommended to have him draw up a “last will and testament,” and voila – estate planning can be crossed off of the to-do list.

This is both patently wrong and exactly how the estate-planning legal cartel actually wants you to approach the topic.  The facts are this:

1)     Estate planning needs to be thought out and executed when everyone involved is of healthy mind and healthy body

2)     Estate planning professionals will either make money on the front end or the back end

3)     Each member of the estate needs to have a basic understanding of wills and trusts (even if a trust isn’t selected)

4)     4) It’s not a one-time event, it requires a little maintenance.

 

So, I’m not going to analyze all of these rules.  In fact, I’m not going to analyze any of them.

Instead, I’m going to present a quick story that will hopefully illustrate all four (and perhaps even a few other) codicils when it comes to what can happen when someone dies and isn’t prepared.

In June of 1997, my father’s first cousin passed away.  She was a simple woman.  She never married and had no children, nor any siblings.  What she did have was a lot of money and as it turns out, a lot of cousins.

Few of these cousins were familiar to me until after the rich cousin passed away.  Then, those cousins’ names became regular features in our lives.

My father was the executor of the estate.  He quickly found his late cousin’s will, flipped to the very last page and called the number of the attorney who had prepared that will back in the 1980s.

That attorney was saddened by the news but promptly invited my father in to his office for the first of several meetings to settle the estate.  My unsuspecting father says that it wasn’t until the third or fourth meeting with the attorney that he figured out what was going on.  The attorney, my father alleged, was milking the estate with unnecessary meetings and discussions, all of which would be tallied and paid out, by the estate.

What a cash cow.  What’s more, this licensed professional failed to propose to my dad’s (now deceased) cousin that she might consider a living trust, IN ADDITION to a will.  So simple, but we’re confident that there was never even so much as a suggestion of this device.

Why might that lawyer have omitted introducing this simple technique?  Because with a trust, the people involved pass their assets privately and simply, and without the involvement of anyone.  Most notably, the estate skips (read: has no involvement with) the probate system.

What’s probate?  Something you won’t like if you’re an heir to the estate.  Probate is the judicial and administrative process whereby dead people have to pay off their debts and settle claims before the living people get their post-tax share.

This process typically involves a minimum of one judge, one court reporter, and you guessed it, one attorney.  All of those people require income to survive and guess who pays that income?  The deceased person’s estate.

But, pretend that the dead person had created a trust which collected and held all of his/her assets.  The judge, the reporter, AND the attorney would never even be made aware that someone had died.

The assets held by the trust (house, bank accounts, IRAs, cars, and everything else) would belong to the trust but be under the absolute control of the beneficiaries of the trust.

And the trust is like a little ghost who only takes instruction from the trustees.  When my dad’s cousin passed away, the moment that a doctor declared her no longer with us, all of her belongings would have immediately transferred to the people named in her trust – bypassing all of the legal roadblocks.

Beware, unless there are elaborate trusts, foundations, contracts, etc…the IRS will get their cut.  There’s just no way to get around the tax man.

But, there is a way to get around the lawyer.

That way is decent estate planning and that starts with a trip to the library.  A Dummies book will probably suffice to get you started.  Just please get started.

So, my father’s cousin’s estate was separated from many thousands of dollars.  The people on the receiving end (luckily) didn’t haggle with one another too much.  So, the divvying went smoothly.

But, if they had been hagglers and the estate hadn’t been given at least some forethought, it would have been a lawyers’ gravy train for some time to come.  Hit fast forward on this story – after this debacle was concluded, my parents sat each of the siblings down and reviewed their wishes with whatever remained after the last one of them passes away.

We’re all clear on how things will go down when that day arrives.  The advice that was also imparted to us is listed above, in facts one through four.

Don’t take it lightly.

When someone dies, everyone is bummed out for a while.  Sitting down with bummed out people and trying to divvy up that person’s property is completely the wrong way to do it.  It needs to be planned out so that the exchange is smooth and doesn’t even become a topic during funerals, wakes, and sitting shiva.

Realizing and reflecting on the fact that you, me, our collective parents (and cousins), and everyone else is going to die, is heavy subject matter.  But I would much rather have a Nietzschean-meaning-of-life crisis when people are alive than when I’m mourning a loss.

So, please, get reading and start reading about estate planning.

 


[1] Editor’s Note: Here’s where I remove the pipe from my mouth, dust the tobacco ash off my v-neck cardigan sweater, and chuckle softly to myself.  “You know ToddR” I say, “you can always tell a Harvard man, but you can’t tell him much.”

Post read (7901) times.

Estate Planning for the Bourgeoisie

downton abbeyLike most of you, I am busy today updating my will, following the birth of the Prince of Cambridge.  I, too, want to ensure that he grows up in the world wanting in nothing.

Naturally it is only just and right that I designate a portion of my entail to His Royal Highness.

That got me thinking about whether I had any advice for the bourgeoisie regarding estate planning.

If you can afford it, please don’t take estate planning advice from a blogger

If you will have sufficient funds at your death to require sophisticated estate planning, you will serve yourself well by hiring a specialized attorney who can advise you on up-to-date, optimal strategies for leaving money in a way that matches your values.

But if you can’t afford it, read on…

If you do not now have – or do not yet have – sufficient funds to pursue sophisticated advice on estate planning, here’s some basic principles to keep in mind.

Make a Will

Even if you are too young to have ever felt death’s breath upon your neck, everything can change in an instant.  Writing down your wishes, having a witness, signing it, storing it safely, and notifying family members of its existence is an act of kindness for all who love you.

Retirement Accounts

You should know that when you open your IRA and 401K accounts, you designate a beneficiary (or beneficiaries) upon your death, and that furthermore, that choice trumps anything written in your will.

Which is why smart estate planners advise you to check your IRA and 401K beneficiaries periodically to be sure they reflect your current wishes.

So, you may have named the cute barista at your favorite coffee shop as a beneficiary to your 401K as a joke when you were 23 and unemployed, but if you don’t change that 70 years later, you may be giving money away on your death to a total stranger, albeit one who made amazing cappuccino foam hearts once upon a time.

A more likely scenario, and hence more worrisome: the 100% IRA beneficiary designation you gave to your first child – because you thought “one and done” – no longer reflects your larger brood of seven additional children and their 43 grandchildren when you die.

Pro tip: Do not create 50 enemies within your own family, cursing you in the grave because you forgot to update your IRA beneficiaries.

Tax Planning

The only thing I want to say here is that my old rule on taxes still applies: If you are going through extraordinary legal and financial hoops to avoid paying taxes, you may be missing the big picture.

Keep it simple – or as simple as you can – and be wary of complicated tax avoidance plans.  The more effective they are, the more likely it is that the IRS will declare them void in the future.  At which point, you’ll owe a lot of money and need to pay more fees to undo the plan.

The more intricate the tax avoidance plan, the more likely it is you’ll create headaches to be undone in the future, albeit with additional expensive fees – of course – for lawyers and advisors.

If it seems too good to be true, like all investments, it probably is.

Letting heirs know your plans

The more I study estate planning, the more I understand that the biggest mistake people make is to keep their plans to themselves.

If your worthy children will not get anything from your estate – which is fine with me because the expectation of inheritance can be a cruel corruptor – then it makes sense to let your heirs know ahead of time.

If your unworthy, rascally, children will not get anything from your estate – which is fine with me if that reflects your values and they’re jerks anyway – then they should know that before you die.

If some children will get more than other children – for whatever valid reason which trumps equal treatment – for goodness sake give everyone a warning and a reason for your choice.

Receiving less than a sibling from a deceased parent, without so much as a warning and a reason, is enough to guarantee inter-generational family strife for your kids’ remaining lives.  Be empathetic, and tell them what’s in the will.

His Royal Highness the Prince of Cambridge

In the meantime, God bless the little heir.  In the event of my untimely death, I hope he enjoys all of my hand-painted Dungeons and Dragons figurines as much as I did.

Post read (5572) times.