Q: I am thinking about buying an annuity. I want to generate dependable income, BUT, how do I make sense out of whether or not an annuity is a good investment in addition to providing a degree of comfort. The tradeoff seems a big gamble, i.e. how long I will live. –Captain Bill H., Friendship, Maine.
A: Apparently annuities are a growing segment of the retirement market, so Bill, your question is timely.
I thought it would be useful to explain how a banker thinks of an annuity. By “banker,” I also mean to explain how your insurance company thinks of the annuity they’re offering you.
From the banker’s – as well as insurance company’s – perspective, an annuity is a great deal, and it’s not a gamble. From your perspective, the story is more mixed.
HOW A BANKER OR INSURANCE COMPANY THINKS OF AN ANNUITY
First off, your insurance company – despite what your friendly insurance broker may tell you – does not offer you the annuity to “guaranty your financial health,” “generate dependable income,” “protect your loved-ones,” or to “make sure you have sufficient income in your retirement years.” The insurance company, instead, is an investor maximizing its profit. When considering an annuity, let’s always keep that in mind first.
Now, like all for-profit financial companies in the known solar system, your insurance company seeks to buy money cheaply and to sell money expensively. This falls under the well-known investment activity: “Buy low, sell high.”
I do not mean to be obtuse when I write “buy money cheaply,” since to the non-financial person “buying money” may begin to sound like Orwellian tautology, but bear with me for a moment. Financial people -including the people who employ your friendly insurance broker – definitely think of their business as buying cheap money and selling expensive money.
Now let’s briefly peek ahead at the Answer Key in the back of this blog: your annuity represents an opportunity to buy cheap money for the insurance company.
Ok, back to the main text of my answer.
All insurance companies need a massive pile of money to operate, so they constantly evaluate the best ways of buying money. When acquiring money, insurance companies have a choice of where to get their money. I’ll run through the three main ways:
- Sometimes insurance companies acquire equity capital through the sale of shares to private or public stock investors. In other words, the companies sell part of themselves to other owners, in exchange for money. All publically owned insurance companies have done this. Equity capital is typically considered extremely expensive money, so insurance companies do this only as a last resort.
- Often insurance companies acquire debtor capital money, otherwise known as borrowing, possibly from a bank but more commonly in the form of a bond from institutional investors. An investment grade insurance company may be able to borrow $1 Billion for 10 years right now at, say, 4% in the bond market. This means the insurance company gets use of $1 Billion, it pays $40 million per year in interest for that privilege, and then it returns the $1 Billion in principal at the end of 10 years. Since rates are historically low right now, and the institutional bond market is extremely efficient at providing capital to insurance companies, this is a great way for insurance companies to acquire money on the cheap.
- And finally, there’s rock-bottom cheap money: your annuity. Given all the costs of acquiring you as a customer and servicing your annuity for your life, plus the retail nature (ie. small size) of the money you’re providing to the insurance company, you would expect this money to be VERY cheap indeed, to make it all worthwhile for the insurance company. Again, remember, they don’t actually care about all the comforting things President Palmer talks about during the Allstate ads. To provide you, the customer, with an annuity, it’s got to be really cheap money. If it wasn’t super cheap, they would just borrow money from the bond markets.
How cheap is cheap? I just went on my own personal preferred insurance company/bank’s website and applied for a $100,000 annuity. I’m 40 years old and applied for a lifetime monthly annuity, with a (fairly typical) 20 years of guaranteed payments. In exchange for my upfront $100,000, the company offered $358.39/month for the rest of my life. The company guarantees that, even if I die suddenly, the first 20 years, or 240 monthly payments, will be paid to my heirs, for a guaranteed payment amount of $86,013.60.
Now, if you’ve been following closely up until now, you’ll already know that I set up my answer to Bill’s question as a less than ringing endorsement for annuities, but the actual quote allows us to see exactly how good or bad the annuity opportunity is in pure financial terms, for both the insurance company and the annuity buyer.
The insurance company will never tell you the cost of borrowing money from their perspective, but I will share with you what their cost would be for my specific annuity.
If I live my expected additional 37.8 years to the ripe old age of 77.8 then the insurance company’s cost of money is 2.79%. Another way of thinking about the calculation is that I would earn 2.79% annually on my $100,000 for the next 38 years if I am lucky enough to live that long. If I’m unlucky, and live fewer years, then my insurance company effectively borrows money at substantially less than 2.79%, possibly below a 0% cost of funds. In that early death scenario, they get money that’s cheaper than free! Equivalently stated, the % return that I receive on my annuity could be negative if I die before my expected time.
If, instead, I live as long as I expect to live, that is to say, until age 100, then my return can be as high as 3.84%, and the insurance company’s cost of funds is equivalently 3.84%. Notice this is still below the 4% they can expect to pay to borrow money in the bond market, making an individual annuity worthwhile to them even if I far exceed my life expectancy.
Let’s take another example. Let’s say Bill, the original questioner above, is a 70 year old man, who can expect an additional 13.7 more years, according to the Social Security actuarial tables, living to the wise old age of 83.7. I applied online to my same insurance company as a 70-year-old man, willing to take just 10 years of guaranteed payments (a reasonable scenario rather than the 20 years of guaranteed payments that a 40 year old might want.) For his $100,000 annuity premium, Bill could expect to receive $597.19/month for the rest of his life with 120 guaranteed payments.
What is the insurance company’s cost of funds in this case, and conversely, Bill’s expected return? If Bill lives to his expected life-span, he would receive a total of $98,536.35, or less than he paid upfront for the annuity, for a negative return on his money. In other words, under a reasonable baseline scenario, the insurance company acquires money at a negative rate of interest. That’s better than free! That’s awesome. If you’re a death-eating, snake-tattoo-on-your-arm annuity provider, of course.
Now, if Bill also lives, as I’m sure he expects to, until the ripe age of 100, he can expect a much improved 5.92% return on his investment, while the insurance company conversely incurs an expensive cost of borrowing from Bill, at 5.92%. However, the insurance company has wisely balanced the probability of free money under an ordinary scenario (Bill lives to his expected life span) versus the very remote probability of maxing out at 5.92%, if Bill hangs on to this mortal coil for a whole century.
Now, I have few rules in life, but one of them is that when you can acquire money somewhere between free and 5.9%, with the probabilities skewing much closer to free, well then you should acquire as much money that way as possible. And figure out what to do with it later. Like, for example, build massive skyscrapers with your money. In a related piece of news, has anyone else noticed that insurance company skyscrapers dominate most major US city skylines? Your death, plus your neglect, help make this happen. I’m just sayin’.
OTHER FACTORS BESIDES RETURN/COST OF FUNDS – SAUSAGE MAKING
In addition to the cost of money for an insurance company, it’s worth understanding another reason insurance companies seek to provide annuities. Most annuity providers are also life insurance companies. This makes sense in the same way that a sophisticated slaughterhouse might provide both premium sausage meat and processed hog food, as one customer’s premature death is balanced by, or better said, hedged by, another customer’s unfortunate longevity.
What do I mean by this? A life insurance policy allows the insurance company the opportunity to collect regular, moderate – typically monthly – premiums. For that opportunity, the insurance company has the obligation to pay out a substantial lump sum upon the death of the insured person. An annuity is the mirror image of a life policy. The insurance company has the opportunity to collect a substantial lump sum up front, and then takes on the responsibility, or liability, to pay out regular, moderate – typically monthly – premiums. When the life insured customer dies, the insurance company “loses.” When the annuity customer dies, the insurance company “wins.” When a company can offer both life insurance and annuities simultaneously, it creates an efficient kind of perpetual sausage-making machine in which money can be continually bought cheaply and sold expensively.
A rash of deaths causing a string of sudden life-insurance payouts can be compensated by a release of the obligation to pay ongoing annuity income to the newly dead. It all works out nicely. If you’re an insurance company.
SHOULD BILL GET AN ANNUITY?
Now that we know the range of investment returns we can expect on an annuity, does it make sense to purchase an annuity, Bill’s original question?
The answer to Bill’s original question is obviously more complex than can be understood in terms of cheap money and expensive money, even if that’s the primary lens of a banker or an insurance company.
The appropriateness of an annuity for any individual owes quite a bit to the individual’s appetite for risk. To return to geometry class, picture the XY axis where X shows an arrow of increasing risk and Y shows an arrow of increasing return. The annuity represents one of the lowest risk and return assets you can possibly acquire, pretty much right next to the 0,0 point on the graph, just above and to the right of straight cash.
If you don’t mind providing free money to insurance companies, and you quite like the idea of cash-like returns, then annuities could be just the thing for you. When you think of if that way, annuities are a perfectly reasonable cash substitute. Despite S&Ps recent warning, State and Federal regulators manage to make the insurance industry a safe place to park funds for life, as long as you understand a) that the return will be terrible and b) the insurance/annuity provider will never, ever, tell you the return you are getting. That information, if disclosed, would embarrass them. And it’s hard to build skyscrapers when you’re feeling embarrassed.
For more on annuities and using the mathematics of discounted cashflows to evaluate them, please see this post:
Discounted Cashflows – Using the math to evaluate an annuity.
 Like a bank, the main requirement for operating an insurance company is to have a pile of money. None of the other functions and requirements for operating an insurance company matter much if you don’t start with a pile or money and then maintain it at all times. Once that pile of money shrinks, it doesn’t matter how good you are at the rest of the things that go into being an insurance company, you’re out of business.
 Like for example how Credit-crunch-poster-child-insurance-company AIG sold $17.4 Billion worth of shares in 2012, because, well, how else are they going to get money? No one wanted to give them money anymore since they were a root cause and casualty of the 2008 Credit Crunch.
 I acknowledge “investment grade insurance company” is a bit of a redundancy in the US context, since non-investment grade insurance companies are generally not allowed to operate, but rather are put into a special receivership status by federal or state regulators, and their portfolios allowed to run off over time. Sometimes this takes decades. I have invested in annuities like this via my investment business, but I digress.
 It may not have been apparent to you as an annuity customer until now, but essentially you’re lending money, just like a bond, to the insurance company. Instead of a $1 Billion loan in the form of a bond, you might turn over $100,000 up front in the form of an annuity. But then – just like a bond – the insurance company has an obligation to provide regular payments back to you in exchange for use of your money. One great aspect of this loan-in-the-shape-of-an-annuity, is that the loan isn’t limited to, for example, 10 years, like a bond. In fact, the loan is forever. You see, the really cool thing about your loan/annuity, (from the insurance company’s perspective) is that they never have to pay you back the principal! You just die, and they keep the $100,000 of your money! Seriously, how great is that? The answer is: very great, as long as you’re an insurance company.
 Advertising, monthly statements, fund transfers, investment disclosures, customer service for your lifetime, plus all those drinks your insurance broker provided you at the Golf Club…none of this comes cheap people!
 I do all my banking and insurance with USAA because their customer service absolutely rocks. It’s leaps and bounds better than any other major customer service business I’ve ever dealt with. Regardless of their customer service awesomeness, I believe their annuity quote to be typical. Let this footnote serve as my unsolicited highest endorsement of USAA, although there’s no absolutely no tie between me or Bankers Anonymous and USAA. But I kind of wish there was. USAA, hit me up, I could be your President Palmer. Call me, maybe.
 Just to walk you thought the thought process if you’ve never applied for an annuity, its common to request an annuity quote for lifetime payments with some period of payments guaranteed to avoid the “I bought the annuity today for a big premium but got hit by a bus next month” problem that most annuity buyers would never be able to overcome. So, typically you buy lifetime payments and the annuity/insurance company agrees to pay your designated heirs at least some year’s worth of payments if you die suddenly. For a relatively young person a 20year guarantee is not atypical. A much older person might choose a shorter guaranteed payment period, like 5 or 10 years guaranteed.
 Incidentally, I’m 99% sure that insurance companies never provide a % return estimate for annuities of the type I’m providing in the main text paragraphs to follow. So the fact that I’m providing this clear-headed financial return analysis may be largely attributed to two factors: a). I’m your best friend, and b). Insurance Companies are not your friend.
 Have you ever wondered what your expected lifespan is, as well as your probability of death in any given year? The Social Security administration has the answers. Not only am I your best friend, but I can predict your date of death as well. Weird. It’s like I have special powers. Anyway, you’re welcome.
 How did I get this % interest rate? I’m kind of glad you asked. Join me a little way down the financial rabbit hole. I got there by applying a single Discount Rate to a formula for figuring out the present value of all the expected future cash-flows. What is a Discount Rate? That’s the single % rate I can apply to all the future cash-flows of an annuity which add up to $100,000 (my original annuity cost). The formula for each single cash flow is “Nth Annuity Payment” in the numerator divided by a denominator of (1+Discount Rate/12) raised to the power of the Nth payment. I know this makes absolutely no sense if you haven’t already worked with the formula before, but my wife made me put it in here. I’ll tell you what, how about some curious and astute reader sends me a note asking me to explain discounted cash flows and I’ll do a whole post about it sometime soon. Is that a deal? In the meantime, trust me that this is how every bank and insurance company evaluates the amount they’ll pay you for your annuity.
 If you have a paranoid frame of mind, you can see how the annuity provider begins to resemble a financial vulture, hoping for your premature demise so they can get free money. Does the flapping of their wings smell like death to you as well?
 In the year 2072, I’m comforted in my old age by my bedside Rihanna clone – scientifically engineered to remain 24 years old. I die quietly in my sleep on our hovercraft, while she lullabies “SOS” until a pass to the next world.
 Let’s just agree to call me Harrison, shall we?
Post read (33710) times.
13 Replies to “Ask an Ex-Banker: Annuities!”
Thanks. Makes sense, of course, but I had not thought about it from an insurance company point of view. Guess they depend upon non-financially minded folks like me. I appreciate your thoughtful discussion. Honest explanations are hard to come by. Thanks, again.
Thank you for the good question!
Straight to the point answer “an annuity is a great deal, and it’s not a gamble.” I think before purchasing annuity make sure you have the knowledge about this complex investment. Seek an advice to a real financial experts not those indicated in pictures above those are magician. LOL
Hi there! Do you use Twitter? I’d like to follow you if that would be ok. I’m absolutely enjoying your blog and look forward to new updates.
Yes, @bankeranonymous Thanks!
Anonymous banker — this is nice to read, but you describe a theoretical product above that doesn’t, in my experience, resemble much of what actually gets sold in the marketplace. In practice, most annuities are either term annuities that continue to pay even after the death of the annuitant, or they are variable annuities that include some form of death benefit. The economics of these things are lousy for the buyer, but the “spend $100,000, die next month and get nothing” worst case is never going to arise for such products.
Why anybody would want to buy an illiquid credit instrument, paying below-market fixed interest rates, in a low-rate environment, seems the fundamental question. For most people, the answer should probably be no. Annuities may have unexpected credit risk too; not always the general credit of the insurance company that seems to be selling it.
The exception, when it becomes rational to buy these things, would typically be when the issuer includes so many incentives that the product, if optimally managed, is almost a guaranteed winner for the buyer. Such products do exist, but retail investors are typically not equipped to identify them or manage them optimally.
Very interesting… common sense makes me think it is right on. Very few of us put ourselves on “the other side”… like sheep not seeing what’s around the next corner to the slaughterhouse! Have an interesting question regarding variable life insurance products…might be an interesting topic… you entertain topics?
Sure. If other people might have the same question, I can either give a short answer here or attempt a longer answer in a blog posting.
is it possible to borrow money, interest only, including life insurance to protect the principle, buy an annuity and pay the interest and insurance from the annuity income and live on the balance?
A perpetual money machine? Sounds great! No, I’m sure that’s not possible for a retail investor to do.
The quick reason is that insurance companies and banks have a ‘bid’ and ‘offer’ when it comes to money.
In other words they take in money cheap, and they give out money expensively. I’m not saying this to be critical of them, it’s just the business model for banks and insurance companies.
If the perpetual money machine as you describe above was possible, banks and insurance companies (and hedge funds, for that matter) would already be capturing the arbitrage, thus making it go away.
Why not simply invest the money you would have in the annuity into triple tax free AAA local bonds–like the kind big municipalities sell? Get your 2 dividend checks per year, protect the principal, and your beneficiaries/heirs can do as they wish with them after you pass away. If you need some of the principal you can sell a portion of the bonds.
Great article. But does one go through any sort of health history check of family history check? If not and for whatever reason most of one’s ancestors have lived well past the normal expiration date, that would seem to swing an individual’s odds in favor of getting the annuity.
Conversely if ancestor’s have a history of heart-attack deaths or cancer at age 60, the opposite. I mean, susceptibility or resistance to several types of causes of death is somewhat genetically-inherited, AFAIK.
Along with that there are social components. A fire-fighter or Alaskan crab fisherman or someone living in a certain city has a greater likelihood of non-health death than a massage therapist or accountant or someone living in a guarded compound and never venturing beyond it.
I love this post! Next time I inquire about an annuity I’m going to speak parseltongue and trick them into disclosing the returns.